previous      content      next
Memory inspections

See also Inspections based on built-in probes

Typical memory-related problems can be recognized with the help of the "Inspections" feature. Inspections enable automatic high-level analysis of application memory. Each inspection automatically detects a specific memory issue. Performing this type of analysis by hand would be a very complicated (if at all possible) task.

With the help of inspections you can easily find the causes and possible solutions of usual memory-related problems.

The "Inspections" view is added to any tab representing objects, such as "All Objects" or any subset of objects. Inspections for all objects (i.e. for the entire snapshot) are also available via top-level tab "Inspections'.

(1) To run all inspections as a batch use "Run All Inspections" button.
(2) To run a single inspection, select it in the tree and use "Run This Inspection Only" button (this is especially useful if you want to apply the changes made to an inspection's options).

All inspections are grouped by category:

Duplicate Strings

Find all java.lang.String's with identical text values. Problem: Duplicate strings waste memory.
Possible solution: Share string instance via pooling or using intern().

Null Fields

Find instance fields with high percentage of 'null' values.
Problem: Possible memory waste.
Possible solutions: If some of the fields are not used, get rid of them rarely assigned fields can be moved to subclasses in the class hierarchy.

Sparse Arrays

Finds arrays with big number of 'null' elements.
Problem: Possible memory waste.
Possible solution: Use alternate data structures e.g. maps or rework algorithms.

Zero Length Arrays

Find multiple instances of zero-length arrays of particular type.
Problem: Memory waste and additional load for garbage collector.
Possible solution: Use empty array per-class singleton e.g. via a static field in class.

Objects Retained by Inner Class Back References

Find objects retained via synthetic back reference of its inner classes.
Problem: Such objects are potential memory leaks.

Lost SWT Controls

Find SWT control instances not accessible from shown UI.
Technically, it finds instances of org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Control which are not accessible from org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display's field 'controlTable'
Problem: Possible memory leaks.
Possible solutions: Examine paths to lost objects to see if they really leaked

Highly Referenced Objects

Finds objects referenced by a large number of other objects.
Possible problems: Incorrect relations between objects in memory, logical errors and/or non-optimal data structures.

Self Referencing Objects

Finds objects with fields referencing 'this'.
Problem: Possibly incorrect logic and/or memory waste.
Possible solution: Remove redundant fields.

Non-Serializable Objects Referenced from Serializable Objects

If a class implements interface java.io.Serializable and one of its serialized fields refers to a non-serializable object (directly or through intermediate objects), java.io.NotSerializableException will be thrown in runtime on attempt to serialize an instance of this class. This inspection automatically detects such situations.

Which objects are inspected

You can inspect all objects implementing Serializable, selecting "Inspections" on the "Memory" tab, or only particular serializable objects.

For example, test whether HTTPSessions would have serialization problems (assume memory snapshot is open):

  • Open all instances of HTTPSession in a new tab: "Memory | Instances by Class... (Ctrl+N)", type "HTTPSession" and press Enter; "Include instances of subclasses" should be selected
  • Click "Inspections" link in the tab
  • Select "Non-Serializable Objects Referenced from Serializables" in the list and run it

Which fields are serialized

  • Class can explicitly specify the list of its serializable fields with the help of static field serialPersistentFields
  • Otherwise, instance fields without transient modifier are serializable

If a serializable class overrides writeObject(ObjectOutputStream) and readObject(ObjectInputStream) methods to change the default serialization behavior, it is impossible to automatically find out what fields will actually be serialized. Thus, the inspection can provide incorrect results for such classes. However, this should not be a big problem, because in most cases this only leads to "false alarms": the inspection would report a referenced non-serialisable object which is not actually serialized by writeObject(ObjectOutputStream).

Please learn more about serialization in this article: http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/ALT/serialization/

Limitation

This inspection is only available for the profiler's own format snapshots, and is not available for HPROF-format snapshots.

The problem with HPROF snapshots is that they do not contain essential information needed for this inspection:

  • It is unknown which classes are serializable, as there is no information about interfaces implemented by particular class
  • It is unknown which fields are transient

The profiler cannot obtain missing data as the HPROF snapshots are produced by a JVM internal dumper which stores only fixed kinds of information.

previous      content      next